Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia"

From GamerGate Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ghazi)
 
(Involved Wikimedia Employees)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
We have a claim that "many" Wikipedia editors have posted to GamerGhazi, but only one example. We should produce more examples to justify this claim, or we should remove it.
 
We have a claim that "many" Wikipedia editors have posted to GamerGhazi, but only one example. We should produce more examples to justify this claim, or we should remove it.
 +
 +
== Involved Wikimedia Employees ==
 +
 +
I have removed the sections on Eloquence, Ironholds, and Jorm because there was no proof that they were directly involved in scandalous behavior related to the Gamergate article. Closely monitoring the article is not evidence of lying or abuse of tools. [[User:Hyatt|Hyatt]] ([[User talk:Hyatt|talk]]) 17:08, 22 March 2019 (CET)

Latest revision as of 18:08, 22 March 2019

/r/gamerghazi

We have a claim that "many" Wikipedia editors have posted to GamerGhazi, but only one example. We should produce more examples to justify this claim, or we should remove it.

Involved Wikimedia Employees

I have removed the sections on Eloquence, Ironholds, and Jorm because there was no proof that they were directly involved in scandalous behavior related to the Gamergate article. Closely monitoring the article is not evidence of lying or abuse of tools. Hyatt (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2019 (CET)