Operation Volcano - Revision history

MikiSayaka33: /* See Also */

2019-10-15T22:53:00Z

‎See Also

MikiSayaka33: /* Operation */

2019-10-15T22:51:40Z

‎Operation

MikiSayaka33: /* Operation */

2018-04-18T18:17:35Z

‎Operation

MikiSayaka33: /* Operation */

2018-04-18T18:14:02Z

‎Operation

MikiSayaka33: /* Operation */

2018-04-09T23:08:36Z

‎Operation

MikiSayaka33: /* Operation */

2018-04-09T23:03:31Z

‎Operation

MikiSayaka33 at 22:56, 9 April 2018

2018-04-09T22:56:03Z

Acidman: Text replacement - "" to " "

2018-01-26T15:19:01Z

Text replacement - "<ref>" to " <ref>"

Acidman: 1 revision imported

2018-01-26T03:12:16Z

1 revision imported

MikiSayaka33 at 20:36, 4 September 2016

2016-09-04T20:36:56Z

New page

{{stub}}

{{Project Infobox
|
| type =
| owner = Leader
| status = Ongoing
}}

==Objective==
Disseminate proof to all gamers that there are gaming journalists, who try to get games remove from sale and they are given a platform by the games media. And are therefore pro-censorship. <ref> "[https://archive.is/YE8Cq Operation Volcano]" 8chan</ref> <ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>

==Goal==

Diminish the readership of all the sites that support these corrupt game journalists and stop peoplee from recommending these sites to other gamers. Drive the journalists to take an ever more extreme stance, when they see those outside of Gamergate getting enraged, they will insult them and speak ill of even more games. This will drive a wedge between these game journalists and their publisher. It will also create another wedge between journalists who are in favor of censorship and those who are against.<ref> "[https://archive.is/YE8Cq Operation Volcano]" 8chan</ref> <ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>

==Operation==

Spread evidence of pro-censorship stances on gaming boards, reddit, comment sections, chans, and other social media, but don't mention [[Gamergate]]. Also, do not raid, spam, grand case on why gamers need to stand against those trying to take away their games. Do not try under any circumstances mention feminism, social justice warriors, and anything related.
Just bring up a few sources that show relevant people, mainly journalists and those journalists which gives them a platform for their pro-censorship ideas (Random Twitter, Youtube, and [[Tumblr]] celebs do not matter).
Avoid guilt by associations further removed than a single link, do not bring up academic papers and do not defend games against causing violence, the goal is to make gamers read the information with as open a mind as possible.
To achieve this end, you need to avoid appearing like a cultist, an activist, a salesman, a lunatic, a conspiracy theorist, and anything similar to these. Reminder do not mention corruption or anything else linked to Gamergate.
Do not give anyone any way to accuse you of belonging to Gamergate. If someone does, deny the accusation. Be careful to not show too much knowledge of Gamergate if you do this. Since you do not want to appear like someone who as a stake in this, neither pro- or anti-. At all costs avoid arguments about whether a game removed from a store constitutes as censorship.
An argument you can make will require too many words and a long discussion between two people will make outsiders uninterested in reading the evidence. Instead say that while the store has the right to remove games from sale as he pleases and everyone has the right to pressure a store into doing this, you have also the right to push back against this. You might get accused of being entitled. Again, make it abundantly clear that it is perfectly natural for you to want to keep the games you want to play available. Avoid making it an issues of right or wrong, plus, do not accuse the pro-censorship side of being immoral (Since being moral issues tend to be long, drawn out, and mostly there's no clear winner).
You are not doing this to win an argument, but to spread the information to more gamers. <ref> "[https://archive.is/YE8Cq Operation Volcano]" 8chan</ref> <ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>

== References ==
<references/>

[[Category: Projects]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 15 October 2019
Line 36:		Line 36:

	[[Operation Chinese Winter]]		[[Operation Chinese Winter]]
		+
		+	[[Operation Vulcan]]

	== References ==		== References ==

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 Carry out the operation. Collect and archived the proof from the past months and post it on [[8chan]]'s [[Gamergate]] thread, nor a recruitement operation.<ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>
 Or on [[Kotaku in Action]]: https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2pzagw/operation_volcano_8chan/
 == References ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 18 April 2018
Line 31:		Line 31:

	Carry out the operation. Collect and archived the proof from the past months and post it on [[8chan]]'s [[Gamergate]] thread, nor a recruitement operation.<ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>		Carry out the operation. Collect and archived the proof from the past months and post it on [[8chan]]'s [[Gamergate]] thread, nor a recruitement operation.<ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>
		+	Or on [[Kotaku in Action]]: https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2pzagw/operation_volcano_8chan/

	== References ==		== References ==

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 Avoid lying about the information. Only disseminate accusations that you have clear, archived proof of. And this is an undercover operation. Don't mention Gamergate or try to restore its honor. This is neither a PR operation nor a recruitment operation.
- <ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>
+Carry out the operation. Collect and archived the proof from the past months and post it on [[8chan]]'s [[Gamergate]] thread, nor a recruitement operation.<ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>
 == References ==

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 Make people aware that it's not just one game that [[SJW|sjws]] and their friends are trying to pull: https://archive.is/7EFvE
 If you have information that can be use to destroy the "It won't happen to the games me and my friends" play, hand it to them.
   <ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 To achieve this end, you need to avoid appearing like a cultist, an activist, a salesman, a lunatic, a conspiracy theorist, and anything similar to these. Reminder do not mention corruption or anything else linked to Gamergate.
 Do not give anyone any way to accuse you of belonging to Gamergate. If someone does, deny the accusation. Be careful to not show too much knowledge of Gamergate if you do this. Since you do not want to appear like someone who as a stake in this, neither pro- or anti-. At all costs avoid arguments about whether a game removed from a store constitutes as censorship.
-An argument you can make will require too many words and a long discussion between two people will make outsiders uninterested in reading the evidence. Instead say that while the store has the right to remove games from  sale as he pleases and everyone has the right to pressure a store into doing this, you have also the right to push back against this. You might get accused of being entitled. Again, make it abundantly clear that it is perfectly natural for you to want to keep the games you want to play available. Avoid making it an issues of right or wrong, plus, do not accuse the pro-censorship side of being immoral (Since being moral issues tend to be long, drawn out, and mostly there's no clear winner).
+Any argument you can make will require too many words and a long discussion between two people will make outsiders uninterested in reading the evidence. Instead say that while the store has the right to remove games from  sale as he pleases and everyone has the right to pressure a store into doing this, you have also the right to push back against this. You might get accused of being entitled. Again, make it abundantly clear that it is perfectly natural for you to want to keep the games you want to play available. Avoid making it an issues of right or wrong, plus, do not accuse the pro-censorship side of being immoral (Since being moral issues tend to be long, drawn out, and mostly there's no clear winner).
-You are not doing this to win an argument, but to spread the information to more gamers.  <ref> "[https://archive.is/YE8Cq Operation Volcano]" 8chan</ref>  <ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>
+You are not doing this to win an argument, but to spread the information to more gamers.  Everything else doesn't matter, if someone insults you, be creative. If there's an opportunity to slip in some info into a discussion that's already under way, do it. A prime example are the discussions about [[Hatred]]'s removal from [[Steam]] that have sprung up in many places in the internet.<ref> "[https://archive.is/YE8Cq Operation Volcano]" 8chan</ref>
 == References ==

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ==Goal==
-Diminish the readership of all the sites that support these corrupt game journalists and stop peoplee from recommending these sites to other gamers. Drive the journalists to take an ever more extreme stance, when they see those outside of Gamergate getting enraged, they will insult them and speak ill of even more games. This will drive a wedge between these game journalists and their publisher. It will also create another wedge between journalists who are in favor of censorship and those who are against. <ref> "[https://archive.is/YE8Cq Operation Volcano]" 8chan</ref>  <ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>
+Diminish the readership of all the sites that support these corrupt game journalists and stop peoplee from recommending these sites to other gamers. Drive the journalists to take an ever more extreme stance, when they see those outside of [[Gamergate]] getting enraged, they will insult them and speak ill of even more games. This will drive a wedge between these game journalists and their publisher. It will also create another wedge between journalists who are in favor of censorship and those who are against. <ref> "[https://archive.is/YE8Cq Operation Volcano]" 8chan</ref>  <ref> "[https://archive.is/5yRsG Operation Volcano (8chan)]" KotakuInAction</ref>
 ==Operation==
-Spread evidence of pro-censorship stances on gaming boards, reddit, comment sections, chans, and other social media, but don't mention [[Gamergate]]. Also, do not raid, spam, grand case on why gamers need to stand against those trying to take away their games. Do not try under any circumstances mention feminism, social justice warriors, and anything related.
+Spread evidence of pro-censorship stances on gaming boards, [[Reddit|reddit]], comment sections, chans, and other social media, but don't mention Gamergate. Also, do not raid, spam, grand case on why gamers need to stand against those trying to take away their games. Do not try under any circumstances mention feminism, social justice warriors, and anything related.
-Just bring up a few sources that show relevant people, mainly journalists and those journalists which gives them a platform for their pro-censorship ideas (Random Twitter, Youtube, and [[Tumblr]] celebs do not matter).
+Just bring up a few sources that show relevant people, mainly journalists and those journalists which gives them a platform for their pro-censorship ideas (Random [[Twitter]], [[Youtube]], and [[Tumblr]] celebs do not matter).
 Avoid guilt by associations further removed than a single link, do not bring up academic papers and do not defend games against causing violence, the goal is to make gamers read the information with as open a mind as possible.
 To achieve this end, you need to avoid appearing like a cultist, an activist, a salesman, a lunatic, a conspiracy theorist, and anything similar to these. Reminder do not mention corruption or anything else linked to Gamergate.

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:12, 26 January 2018
(No difference)